9/11 Truth Community Kingston

Monday, November 27, 2006

Looking for any Kingston Truth Group

I have moved away from Kingston and no longer will be doing any activism in the area. If anyone wishes to have this blog they are more then welcome to it. May the truth be known.

Peace,

Carbon

Thursday, September 14, 2006

Ipsos Reid Poll: 22% Think 9/11 was Inside Job

Printed in the Winnipeg Free Press, september 11th, 2006, buried half way down an article on page A5:

"In a bizarre finding, the polling firm [Ipsos Reid] reported that 22 per cent of Canadians believe in a conspiracy theory in which the terrorist attacks were orchestrated by a "group of highly influential Americans and others" rather than by supporters of Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaida terrorist network."

This is front page news being pushed back because of its controversial nature.

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

Queen's Journal Op-Ed

9/11’s Elephant in the Living Room

Published September 8th, 2006

Did 9/11 really unfold like the US government tells us? An increasing number of people are questioning the official story. A recent Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll conducted found that 36% of Americans believe that it is ‘very likely’ or ‘somewhat likely’ that federal officials either participated in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon or took no action to stop them ‘because they wanted the United States to go to war in the Middle East’. The poll also found that 16% of Americans believe that the WTC towers and World Trade Center Building 7 were destroyed by explosives. This is starkly different from the official narrative which states that they collapsed from a combination of plane crashes and office fires. Why the great discrepancy, and how do the two theories stand up against each other?

An examination of World Trade Center Building 7 and the facts surrounding its collapse will hopefully illustrate why many people doubt the US government's account of 9/11. To start, World Trade Building 7 was a 47 storey building with a steel frame that housed many federal agencies including the CIA. Nearby the WTC towers, it was said to have been evacuated early that day after it suffered some minor damage. The fires were small and would have been routine for NYC firefighter teams but they were left alone. Around 5:20 pm on 9/11 the building disappeared in under seven seconds into a cloud of smoke. Poof! What happened to Building 7?

The official story claims that an explosion of the diesel fuel tanks in the basement caused the complete collapse of the building. But the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) official report admits that:

“The specifics of the fires in WTC7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence.”

The investigations into WTC7 leave some disturbing questions. Why does FEMA conclude it was fire and quit probing when it admits its theory is highly unlikely? Strangely, FEMA’s non-investigation is consistent with that of the official 9/11 Commission: the collapse of WTC7 is not mentioned once in the 571-page 9/11 Commission Report.

Let’s examine the facts. First, WTC7 collapsed into itself in about seven seconds. In fact, it accelerates downward at nearly the rate of objects in free-fall. Hardly any damage is caused to the surrounding buildings because it collapses onto its own base, or “footprint”. Nothing is left of the building but one-storey pile of rubble. Secondly, a kink forms near the centre of the building during the collapse, indicating a near-centre column is the first to fail. Destroying a centre column first is normal in controlled demolitions because it pulls buildings inwards. Thirdly, a row of “squibs”, or dust-jets are seen shooting out of the building sequentially. Fourthly, huge expanding dust clouds made of pulverized concrete puff out of the base. Fifthly, mixtures of liquid steel are found in the rubble weeks after the collapse, which simply cannot be produced by office fires. Sixthly, all the previous points are explained by, and even expected in controlled demolition. These are unknown events for typical office fires. In fact, there are no examples of steel-framed buildings collapsing at all like WTC7 from fire, even though there are many cases of more intense and longer burning fires in steel-framed skyscrapers. Seventhly, the building’s owner Larry Silverstein said on PBS’s 9/11 special America Rebuilds that the collapse of building 7 was purposefully demolished:

I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander … and I said “We’ve had such a terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.” And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.”

The phrase “pull it” is an industry-wide term for demolish. Controlled demolition cannot be done in a day. It takes demolition experts weeks of careful planning. Lastly, after reviewing the footage of the collapse, Queen’s University’s civil engineering professor Luke Bisby admitted:

“The collapse of WTC 7 looks similar to the type of collapse that one would expect in a controlled demolition.”

The compelling physical evidence for the controlled demolition of WTC7, the US government’s refusal to properly investigate, and the surprising omission of this issue from the front page of our newspapers is alarming to say the least. As the polls show the cover-up of 9/11 has become an elephant of an issue, the mainstream media continues to deny its existence. Yet it’s there and it’s not going away. Because of the implications of a cover-up, we ought to seriously reevaluate the recent changes in our foreign policy that stemmed from 9/11: the so-called War on Terror, and our occupation of Afghanistan. Moreover, we need to recognize that the mainstream media is obstructing the truth about WTC7 and ask ourselves, why?

Sunday, September 10, 2006

CBC Gives 9/11 Truth Fair Shake

Tonight's epidsode of Sunday Edition was a fairly balanced story of the movement for the truth behind 9/11. Taking interviews from David Ray Griffin, Dylan Avery, the editor of Popular Mechanics, and 9/11 Commissioner Kean, the evidence for a coverup was given in a straight up method.

This is going to create some big waves.

http://www.911blogger.com/node/2719

Tuesday, September 05, 2006

CBC's Plugs Official 9/11 Story, Again

Coming up to commemorate the 5th anniversary of 9/11 is a CBC special titled "The Secret History of 9/11". Playing at 7pm on september 10th, this two-hour documentary represents the government's propaganda campaign to distract the public from the important questions about 9/11.

I urge everyone to write CBC and tell them either to change the documentary to represent the variety of opinion about 9/11 and discuss the possibility of government complicity.

http://www.cbc.ca/contact/index.jsp

Some questions you might pose:

Why wasn't building 7 investigated properly?
Why were Pentagon defenses not operating?
Why weren't jet fighters summoned quickly?
Why does the Pentagon withhold videos that would prove their story?
Why was the WTC steel taken away and destroyed overseas?

There are many unanswered questions about 9/11 that the CBC sees unfit to investigate. Why?

Monday, August 21, 2006

Queen's Journal Op-Ed

The Queen's Journal is printing an op-ed about 9/11, being published in the first issue back. Available on september 8th, 2006.

Sunday, August 06, 2006

Back from 9/11 Leader Recruiting in Quebec

During a five week french immersion program at Trois-Pistoles Quebec, I took the opportunity to network with youths from across Canada. I distributed 9/11 information cards, and gave out videos to those that expressed interest. Others I asked directly to start their own university action clubs based on demanding 9/11 truth. The response was mostly positive, I received lots of encouragement from many people including the program director. In the next week I am headed to Kenora for two weeks to visit my family and participate in a 9/11 conference in Winnipeg, MB on August 20th with stoplying.ca's Dr. Hawkins.

I am looking for a Kingston residents to participate in a leaflet action at the Kingston movie theatres during the release of Oliver Stone's World Trade Center. The release date is the 9th of August, and I will be leafletting in Kenora if the film is playing there. The job involves copying sheets, getting to the theatres before the play time and handing them out. Email me if you are interested.