Looking for any Kingston Truth Group
Peace,
Carbon
9/11’s Elephant in the Living Room
“The specifics of the fires in WTC7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence.”
The investigations into WTC7 leave some disturbing questions. Why does FEMA conclude it was fire and quit probing when it admits its theory is highly unlikely? Strangely, FEMA’s non-investigation is consistent with that of the official 9/11 Commission: the collapse of WTC7 is not mentioned once in the 571-page 9/11 Commission Report.
Let’s examine the facts. First, WTC7 collapsed into itself in about seven seconds. In fact, it accelerates downward at nearly the rate of objects in free-fall. Hardly any damage is caused to the surrounding buildings because it collapses onto its own base, or “footprint”. Nothing is left of the building but one-storey pile of rubble. Secondly, a kink forms near the centre of the building during the collapse, indicating a near-centre column is the first to fail. Destroying a centre column first is normal in controlled demolitions because it pulls buildings inwards. Thirdly, a row of “squibs”, or dust-jets are seen shooting out of the building sequentially. Fourthly, huge expanding dust clouds made of pulverized concrete puff out of the base. Fifthly, mixtures of liquid steel are found in the rubble weeks after the collapse, which simply cannot be produced by office fires. Sixthly, all the previous points are explained by, and even expected in controlled demolition. These are unknown events for typical office fires. In fact, there are no examples of steel-framed buildings collapsing at all like WTC7 from fire, even though there are many cases of more intense and longer burning fires in steel-framed skyscrapers. Seventhly, the building’s owner Larry Silverstein said on PBS’s 9/11 special
“I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander … and I said “We’ve had such a terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.” And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.”
The phrase “pull it” is an industry-wide term for demolish. Controlled demolition cannot be done in a day. It takes demolition experts weeks of careful planning. Lastly, after reviewing the footage of the collapse, Queen’s University’s civil engineering professor Luke Bisby admitted:
“The collapse of WTC 7 looks similar to the type of collapse that one would expect in a controlled demolition.”
The compelling physical evidence for the controlled demolition of WTC7, the